Your Turn To Prove - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Your Turn To Prove

Statement Of Principle

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-01-1970, 12:00 AM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
Your Turn To Prove

brianmanzella wrote:

Still no answers....



Below is my response to Brian's quest for "answers" posted on the 24Basic Components / One Ball Location Vs. Multiple thread. It works just aswell here.

brianmanzella wrote:

Maybe if I use another tack, someone will listen.

When Homer wrote the book there was no such thing as sweetspots that all lined up the same.

So, an intelligent person, or a non-biased person can plainly see that Homer could not have put it in the book.

Yoda, I am not talking about the in-line condition, I am talking about the wedge sweetspot lining up the same as the three irons.

So, am I right, does this make a difference that is NOT refered to in the book?



Okay, Brian, you are obviously 'dialed in' on this one.

Interestingly, when I answer your posts -- and bury your personal opinion withscientific fact -- you promptly disappear.

When I don't, you are like the Energizer Bunny.

So, once again you demand my time. Well....

Let's let you do the proving for a change...

The 3-iron is how long? __________________.


The lob wedge is how long? _________________________.


The sweet spot differential is _______________________.

This makes up for the difference in shaft lengthbecause_____________________________________ __________________________________.

If Homer were alive today he would agree with me because, given the above,____________________________________________ _________________________________________________.

I said in a prior post that no Aiming Point change was necessary with my 'oneball location' but now I agree that there must be one because___________________________________________ ___________________________.

Go for it.

 

brianmanzella wrote:

Maybe if I use another tack, someone will listen.

When Homer wrote the book there was no such thing as sweetspots that all lined up the same.

So, an intelligent person, or a non-biased person can plainly see that Homer could not have put it in the book.

Yoda, I am not talking about the in-line condition, I am talking about the wedge sweetspot lining up the same as the three irons.

So, am I right, does this make a difference that is NOT refered to in the book?



Okay, Brian, you are obviously 'dialed in' on this one.

Interestingly, when I answer your posts -- and bury your personal opinion withscientific fact -- you promptly disappear.

When I don't, you are like the Energizer Bunny.

So, once again you demand my time. Well....

Let's let you do the proving for a change...

The 3-iron is how long? __________________.


The lob wedge is how long? _________________________.


The sweet spot differential is _______________________.

This makes up for the difference in shaft lengthbecause_____________________________________ __________________________________.

If Homer were alive today he would agree with me because, given the above,____________________________________________ _________________________________________________.

I said in a prior post that no Aiming Point change was necessary with my 'oneball location' but now I agree that there must be one because___________________________________________ ___________________________.

Go for it.

__________________
Yoda
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.